Now to the technical sides, to visualize the difference in timeout we need subtract the new timeout value from the old timeout value to get what kind of increase we are talking about, here is a graph that shows the difference in timeout between the two formulas Okay, I will refrain from continuing to discuss balance changes compared to each other, although I would like to mention that comparing the change in meld timer is highly correlated to the removal of the exploit while the Van Doorn voice pack isn't, but that's beyond the scope of our discussion now. Let's not mix things here, the change to compensate the removal of this exploit was the "increase" in meld timers NOT the price changes on the other projects' MELD costs because even WITH the exploit the old prices were very prohibitive.ītw I am trying to read the graph you posted, I dont see the 1 turn head start, both b15d and b15e timers start at 1 turn timeout at 0 tiles and they start to differentiate by 1 turn after about 10 tiles difference, the difference becomes hardly significant EVEN at the end of the graph where meld canister at 70 tiles far away expire AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME while canisters at 73~75 have 1 turn timeout difference, I don't get where did you get the 3 turns per 20 tiles from? the difference is 1 turn MAX and more than 50% of the time it is not even there. Was the change in MEC augmentation costs and the foundry project related to removing this exploit in the first place? Does this mean that original prices were adjusted considering exploits that players use or what?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |